title

Amending the Arbitration Law will advance China's status as an international dispute resolution hub, and help align such activities in the country with global practice, said foreign arbitrators and legal experts on Tuesday.

They made the remarks after many members of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, China's top political advisory body, called for improvements to China's legal system regarding arbitration last week, noting that revisions should be carried out in light of the characteristics and development trends of arbitration, combining China's real-time circumstances with international practice.

China's Arbitration Law, which came into force on Sept 1, 1995, is being discussed by the public after the Ministry of Justice presented a draft revision to the legislation for public consultation on July 30, 2021 in order to update the basic framework and bring it more closely in line with well-recognized international practice.

Mark Feldman, a law professor at the School of Transnational Law of Peking University and arbitrator of the Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration in Guangdong province, said many provisions in the draft reflect policy shifts that, if adopted, will help remove existing legal obstacles to China's continued development as an international dispute resolution hub.

Since many national political advisors suggested that the jurisdiction of China's arbitration authorities should be further expanded to include more disputes-such as those involving intellectual property rights, international investment, sports and antimonopoly-Feldman said that given that arbitrators often develop subject matter expertise in one of these areas, specialized rosters for particular subject matter areas are often appropriate.

Sports-related and international disputes should likewise be fully included within the permissible scope of arbitration. Specialized arbitration rules and panels should be systematically studied and considered by working groups composed of experts from various jurisdictions, said Peter Neumann, arbitrator of the Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration and adjunct professor of law at California-based Pepperdine University.

China's arbitration system has made outstanding and commendable progress in recent years. In particular, its Supreme People's Court, through various judicial interpretations, policies and reforms, has taken meaningful steps to bring the nation's arbitration and legal systems more closely in line with international practice, Neumann said.

"While the Arbitration Law provides an effective framework for domestic and foreign-related arbitrations where awards are to be enforced in China, supported by decisions of the courts among others, there are some gaps in the Arbitration Law as regards cross-border and international arbitration," said Kim Rooney, arbitrator of the Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration and a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region-based barrister.

Rooney said that filling these gaps is likely to enhance China's attractiveness to foreign businesses.

Independence and impartiality of arbitrators can be enhanced by disclosure requirements to avoid conflicts of interest and sanctioned by effective disqualification rules and challenge procedures, said Peter Malanczuk, arbitrator of the Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration and adjunct professor of the faculty of law at the University of Hong Kong.

China has already become a major trading partner for many countries across the world, and arbitration has become a vital alternative to litigation in commercial disputes between its businesses and global companies, said Yu Yi, spokesman for Beijing-based China Council for the Promotion of International Trade.

The country's 270 arbitration institutions handled over 415,000 cases in 2021, involving a total of over 850 billion yuan ($127.42 billion)-a new high. China has become one of the leading countries to use arbitration to resolve civil and commercial disputes, the CCPIT said.

Eager to deepen legal cooperation for the growth of the Belt and Road Initiative in an institutionalized way, the Beijing-based China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission formed partnerships with 32 overseas arbitration institutions last year.

Disclaimer Statement:


The site does not verify the authenticity of the articles reproduced or translated from the Internet. All views expressed in such articles do not represent the opinions of the site. Please contact us for correction or deletion if you find any misstated source or copyrighted material. Thanks!